Prompts for AR Smart Shopper

You are a friendly food-label explainer. Decode the ingredient list below into plain language a shopper can understand at a glance. For each ingredient give a short everyday explanation of what it is and why it is there, and a concern level of low, medium or high. Do not give medical or dietary advice; this is general guidance only. Return JSON: {"ingredients":[{"name":"","plainLanguage":"","concern":"low"}],"summary":"","disclaimer":"General guidance, not medical or dietary advice."}. Ingredients: "Whole wheat flour, refined wheat flour, sugar, palm oil, oats, invert syrup, raising agents (500(ii), 503(ii)), iodised salt, emulsifier (322 soya lecithin), added flavours."

Read the per-100g nutrition panel below and give a short, plain-language verdict for an everyday shopper. List the clear positives and the clear negatives, focusing on energy, sugar, saturated fat, sodium and fibre, and finish with a one-line takeaway. This is general guidance, not medical or dietary advice. Return JSON: {"verdict":"","positives":[],"negatives":[],"takeaway":"","disclaimer":"General guidance, not medical or dietary advice."}. Nutrition (per 100 g): Energy 462 kcal; Protein 7.2 g; Carbohydrate 68.5 g of which total sugars 21.4 g; Total fat 17.8 g of which saturated 8.9 g; Dietary fibre 5.1 g; Sodium 320 mg.

Give a brief, honest eco-impact note for the packaged product described below, based only on the packaging and sourcing information provided. Rate the overall impact as low, medium or high, explain the main factors (packaging material, recyclability, notable ingredients such as palm oil), and add one practical suggestion for a lower-impact choice. Keep it factual and avoid unverifiable claims. Return JSON: {"rating":"medium","note":"","factors":[],"suggestion":""}. Product: multigrain biscuits in a plastic wrapper inside a paperboard carton; contains palm oil; no on-pack recycling information provided.

Given the product, its health score and the shopper's saved preferences and allergies, give a single clear recommendation of buy, consider or skip, with a short personalised reason (one or two sentences). Respect the preferences: flag added sugar for a low-sugar preference, non-vegetarian ingredients for a vegetarian preference, and any listed allergen. This is general guidance, not medical or dietary advice. Return JSON: {"verdict":"consider","reason":"","personalised":"","disclaimer":"General guidance, not medical or dietary advice."}. Product: multigrain biscuits. Health score: 54 / 100. Preferences: ["vegetarian","low-sugar"]. Allergies: ["peanuts"].

Compare the two packaged products below for an everyday shopper. Contrast them on sugar, saturated fat, sodium, fibre and any additives, say which is the better everyday choice and why in plain language, and note when the other might still make sense. Keep it factual; this is general guidance, not medical or dietary advice. Return JSON: {"winner":"A","reasons":[],"whenOtherIsFine":"","disclaimer":"General guidance, not medical or dietary advice."}. Product A (per 100 g): sugars 21.4 g, saturated fat 8.9 g, sodium 320 mg, fibre 5.1 g. Product B (per 100 g): sugars 12.0 g, saturated fat 5.5 g, sodium 410 mg, fibre 7.8 g.

Suggest three budget-friendly, healthier swaps for the product below, for a shopper who wants lower sugar and sodium without spending much more. Describe each swap by its type or category rather than a brand name, explain in one line why it is a better choice, and note a rough price expectation (cheaper, similar or slightly more). Keep it factual and avoid brand names. This is general guidance, not medical or dietary advice. Return JSON: {"swaps":[{"category":"","why":"","priceExpectation":"similar"}],"disclaimer":"General guidance, not medical or dietary advice."}. Product: sweetened multigrain biscuits, per 100 g sugars 21.4 g, sodium 320 mg.

A photorealistic wide marketing poster of a shopper in a bright modern supermarket aisle holding up a smartphone to scan a packaged product's barcode, with a translucent violet-and-emerald AR overlay floating from the phone showing an abstract health-score ring, small ingredient chips and a price-comparison bar. Clean soft retail lighting, shallow depth of field, violet and emerald colour palette (#7c3aed and #10b981), crisp glassmorphism UI holograms, generous negative space at the top for a headline. No text, no logos, no readable words in the image. Modern, friendly, high detail.

A clean conceptual poster showing a packaged food label on the left transforming into a set of glowing translucent cards on the right, each card an abstract icon for an ingredient, a nutrition verdict, a leaf for eco impact and a balance scale for a buy-or-skip decision, connected by a soft arrow of light, over a violet-emerald gradient studio background. Minimalist premium consumer-app look, subtle glassmorphism, colour palette #7c3aed and #10b981. No text, no readable words, no brand names.

An elegant consumer-app poster of a floating decision card with a large abstract balance-scale motif and three soft glowing chips in green, amber and red suggesting a buy / consider / skip choice, over a clean light-slate background with subtle glassmorphism panels and a faint health-score ring behind. Calm, trustworthy, helpful mood, violet and emerald palette (#7c3aed, #10b981) with slate #0f172a accents. No readable text, no real names, no logos.

A sleek poster showing a floating holographic price-comparison panel as a set of horizontal bars of different lengths, one bar highlighted in emerald as the lowest, beside an abstract product silhouette, all in violet and emerald over a clean light background with glassmorphism. Data-driven, value-focused, optimistic mood, colour palette #7c3aed and #10b981. No readable numbers or text, no logos, no real names.